Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Liam Broady vs Flavio Cobolli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broady vs Cobolli analysis and find out who is favored!
Liam Broady vs Flavio Cobolli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Cobolli
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broady has won 49.19% of points on their second serve, while Cobolli has won 51.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broady, in recent form, has won 51.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cobolli has won 49.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.75% and 31.98% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broady has saved 66.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cobolli has saved 65.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broady has won 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/ 23), with Cobolli winning 61.63% (W/L 53/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 249/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 32/ 55). Cobolli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 39/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Broady has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12), where as Cobolli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broady winning 1 times and Cobolli being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Broady winning 2 and Cobolli winning 0. The last match between Broady and Cobolli was at the Bratislava Challenger, 07-11-2022, First, I.hard with Liam Broady getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broady and Cobolli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broady winning 0 times and Cobolli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Broady winning 1, and Cobolli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broady has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.83 while Cobolli has played against players with an average rank of 237.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broady has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cobolli has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broady has converted 40.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cobolli has converted 40.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
147
Rank
93
High
30
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
53
Rank
53
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
58% (470-343)
Career Total W/L
57% (171-128)
50% (5-5)
YTD W/L
62% (24-15)
$1,004,050
Career Prize Money
$778,295
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Liam Broady | Flavio Cobolli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:26 | 1:27:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (42/59) | 59% (43/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (33/42) | 63% (27/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 43% (13/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (33/73) | 29% (17/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-0 |
Stats 
Liam Broady
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Liam Broady | Flavio Cobolli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (5/5) | 62% (24/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 55% (57/47) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (101/93) | 52% (507/472) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 67% (14/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 32 | 203 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:24 | 1:55:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.9 | 186.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (373/619) | 56% (1682/3009) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (263/373) | 72% (1214/1682) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (121/246) | 51% (679/1327) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (27/66) | 40% (118/292) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (249/626) | 39% (1206/3087) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 44% (4/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 64% (14/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 62% (21/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 27% (3/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 71% (12/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 89% (19/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 11% (19/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 35% (20/7) |
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Liam Broady
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Pedro Cachin
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Aziz Dougaz
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Flavio Cobolli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Flavio Cobolli
52%
(
79 of
152)
1st Serve %
54%
(
94 of
173)
3
Aces
14
7
Double Faults
6
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
70 of
94)
58%
(
42 of
73)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
34%
(
52 of
152)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
63 of
173)
163
Total Points Won
162
|
6-4 6-3 3-6 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
56%
(
70 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
81 of
132)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
50 of
81)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
46 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
132)
141
Total Points Won
115
|
6-2 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Flavio Cobolli
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Ben Shelton
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
6
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Aslan Karatsev
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Flavio Cobolli
50%
(
50 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
65 of
120)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
120)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Maximilian Marterer
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Flavio Cobolli
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Nicolas Jarry
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Broady Vs Cobolli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
